Tag Archive | Trump

Wither the Dream?

Wither the Dream?
David R. Weiss – January 20, 2024

There is no ‘h’ missing in that opening word. I am not asking for directions. Least of all to Iowa. No, consider this an imprecatory op-ed.

This piece has been percolating since the Iowa Republican caucuses last week, but it’s not about Iowa’s Republican voters. It’s about MAGA America’s moral vision. That vision will shape America’s vote next fall (as it shaped Iowa’s vote last week). And, unchecked, it will wither the dream.

Which dream? Not the “American dream” of material prosperity, personal liberty, and individual success. Rather, I mean the dream of the America-that-could-be, were we ever to pursue our highest ideals as fervently as we cling to our most dangerous national myths. The promise of inclusive justice, far-reaching and secure civil rights, vigorous voter protections, and a commitment to mutual care over corporate or individual profit. That dream. It’s never yet been realized; not even close.

Indeed, it’s fair to say the founders themselves never intended for it to be realized. They almost certainly and “innocently” imagined their ideals reaching expansively toward a widening horizon of people … just … like … them. (White, propertied, men.) That doesn’t demean the dream itself. All of our dreams are framed (and thus limited) by the contexts of our lives. If we’re fortunate, the ideals behind those dreams carry seeds that can take root in the tiniest of cracks and bear within them the power to split concrete.

The ideals that drive the dream of the America-that-could-be carries such seeds. We saw this in struggle to abolish slavery. In the suffrage movements for blacks and women. In the labor movement. In the civil rights movements for women, persons of color, and LGBTQ persons. Though far from complete, the seeds of that dream have done much good.

But today that dream, its ideals and the seeds they carry are in peril. There are those—and their number is not small—who would wither the dream. Increasingly the moral vision that is broadly embodied (and emboldened) by the MAGA-constrained GOP is a vision of an America hellbent on doing just that. It is a dehumanizing vision, one set against the grounding ideals not only of Christianity, but also of humanism, and the core values of all the world’s great religious traditions.

Read those last two sentences as many times as you need to for them to sink in: The MAGA-constrained GOP vision for America is hellbent on withering the dream of the America-that-could-be. It is a dehumanizing vision that runs directly counter to the grounding ideals of Christianity, humanism, and the core values of all the world’s great religious traditions. This moral vision, wrapped in an American flag and dipped in “Christian” rhetoric is actually a consummate rejection and betrayal of both America’s highest ideals and Christianity’s deepest moral vision. And now—right now, this very year—it hopes to wither the dream once and for all.

In practice, all politics comes down to how communities choose to hold and share power—for whose benefit and through what processes. The often unseen, sometimes intentionally hidden infrastructure of politics is the notion of “moral community.” That is: who counts—whose wellbeing matters—when decisions are made? The systemic shortcomings—today we rightfully recognize them as systemic injustices—in the founders’ social vision were largely the result of the limits to their moral community. Enslaved persons, indigenous persons, black persons, women, those who didn’t own property, the poor, and poor children—all found their moral membership, the fullness of their personhood, unrecognized and unprotected. The ideals of the nation didn’t encircle them because they were left outside—excluded from—the moral community.

Today’s MAGA-constrained Republican Party has fashioned a moral community intentionally hemmed to exclude or diminish the humanity of a multitude of others through the not so subtle culture of xenophobia. Jesus would be appalled. So would Gandhi, the Dalai Lama, Desmond Tutu, Mother Teresa, Harriet Tubman, Buddha, Confucius, Black Elk, Rumi, and many others whose perceptive wisdom, kindness, and moral courage has marked them as enlightened.

Within the MAGA moral vision, othering runs rampant. It is a white supremacist, nationalist, patriarchal moral community to which certain women and persons of color are extended guest privileges … but only insofar as they fit within its unquestioned value structure. Nikki Haley is an example of a woman of color who moves precariously across this landscape. She must deny the systemic racism in American society to maintain her place in the GOP community (even though she experienced it herself). And even so, Trump openly questions the legitimacy (the purity!) of her status in “his” moral community and asserts that the MAGA base will never support her.

This othering includes the diminishment (or altogether erasure) of the humanity of immigrants, persons of color, incarcerated persons, LGBTQ persons, women, hourly workers, and the poor (as well as a functional contempt toward the natural world). What becomes clear is that the MAGA moral community is set up according to strict binaries; within these binaries there are rigid power relationships; and those persons who challenge these power relationships must have their personhood diminished or erased so as to preserve the purity and order of the moral community.

What becomes equally clear is that the MAGA phenomenon is less about “family” values than about power. It naturally allies itself with values (rooted in identities rather than principles) that are well-suited for conserving power—and those values are “family” values only in the sense that they allow for the narrowing down of “family” into a moral community of persons … “just like us” (or willing to act within our power structure according to our terms).

As the 2024 election cycle unfolds, it will be helpful (although unsettling) to consider the policy positions and the rhetoric of Trump and other MAGA/GOP candidates through the prism of moral community, binary values, and the dream of the America-that-could-be. I think it will be quickly and painfully clear that they represent lightly veiled attempts to define “America” as a moral community that sounds expansive but is bounded by values that leave a multitude of us and our friends outside. And when it comes to moral communities, being on the outside is being in the wilderness. Exposed. Vulnerable. Targeted. And very much beyond the reach of the dream.

In future essays this spring I will explore further some of the ways this othering plays out. Including how religion plays into it. And how the Democratic establishment (including Joe Biden) misses critical opportunities to reach those disaffected voters (disaffected fellow citizens!) drawn to the MAGA/GOP fold but not hardcore members of the MAGA base. In this failure, Democrats themselves raise the risk of a catastrophic MAGA victory this fall.

Finally, I hope to offer some thoughts to engage the shrinking but all the more critical “moveable middle” of the electorate. Come November, these persons, who are hardly our closest political allies, will cast the ballots that decide whether this is the year we wither the dream. It’s time we figure out how to invite these folks to join us in pursuing the America-that-could-be.

*   *   *

David Weiss is a theologian, writer, poet and hymnist, “writing into the whirlwind” of contemporary challenges, joys, and sorrows around climate crisis, sexuality, justice, peace, and family. Reach him at drw59mn@gmail.com. Read more at www.davidrweiss.com where he blogs under the theme, “Full Frontal Faith: Erring on the Edge of Honest.” Support him in Writing into the Whirlwind at www.patreon.com/fullfrontalfaith.

An Open Letter to Minnesota’s ELCA Bishops

NOTE: On Sunday afternoon I emailed this letter to all six of Minnesota’s ELCA bishops, along with a brief introductory note in which I state, “I am deeply concerned that the President is leading us into an era in which he will intentionally escalate xenophobic fear in order to make possible deep and damaging changes to our institutions and to the social fabric of our society. The church cannot be caught flat-footed in this moment. It cannot take a cautious “wait and see” approach. I know the situation regarding the order on refugees and immigrants is dynamic and may change between the time I send and you read this message. Nevertheless, I ask you to take my words to heart and consider together how you will choose to exercise leadership for Minnesota Lutherans in which is quickly becoming a national crisis of civility and Christian conscience. I believe that some statement of public witness that includes both a clear pronouncement that the administration’s intended treatment of refugees and immigrants is unequivocally unchristian—and a clear pronouncement that you WILL lead your church into direct confrontation with an administration if it tries to compel your members to betray their faith for sake of country—is essential.”

 

An Open Letter to Minnesota’s ELCA Bishops

On this Fourth Sunday after Epiphany
January 29, 2017
“What does the LORD require of you, except this, that you do justice,
that you show mercy, and that you walk humbly with your God?” Micah 6:8

Dear friends in Christ,

As I write these words, Muslims, immigrants, and especially refugees, tremble in fear.

While the President has done many things in his first week in office that Christians might take issue with, his executive order this past Friday banning refugees along with immigrants from certain countries is jarring in its immediacy.

As Lutherans we affirm with evangelical zeal that God’s work happens through our hands. Here in Minnesota we Lutherans have set the standard for using our hands to provide human hospitality and institutional resources of welcome to the immigrant and refugee communities that make Minnesota their home. Even as we struggle (with little success) to deepen the diversity in our congregations, we have at least continued to excel in our active witness of welcome to immigrants and refugees.

But the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service calls the President’s recent order “a drastic contradiction of what it means to be an American” in that it “completely disregards the values on which our country was founded.” In fact, the LIRS, hardly a voice on the leftwing fringe, goes so far as to name this executive order “reprehensible.” (lirs.org, January 27, 2017)

More than this, for Christians, it is unconscionable. It asks us to violate our conscience.

The witness of our Hebrew forebears is unequivocal: “When an alien resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress the alien. You shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.” (Leviticus 19:33-34)

The declaration of Jesus is equally clear: “I was a stranger and you welcomed (or did not) welcome me … just as you did it (or did not do it) to the least of these.” (Matthew 25: 35, 40, 43, 45)

And the pledges we make in baptism reveal the stark death-to-life transformation that sits at the heart of our faith. “I renounce the devil and all the forces that defy God. I renounce the powers of this world that rebel against God. And I renounce the ways of sin that draw me from God.” (ELW, p. 229, Holy Baptism)

Thus, to be ordered to participate in the detention and/or deportation of refugees or lawful “aliens” (the word used in both the President’s order and the biblical text) will place Christians who work in U.S. Immigration, Homeland Security, or other agencies directed to execute this order, in a position that requires them to contradict their faith. To borrow the powerful image from Shusaku Endo’s Silence, they will be forced to trample on the face of Christ.

We—all of us—are ever tempted to be moderate in our response to evil. We prefer to wait and see. We’d rather defer to the courts (whose current stay is only temporary and in no way removes the contradiction to personal faith). We hope for the best. We’re content to pray.

However, in this moment, on this Sunday as we hear both the words of Micah and the Beatitudes, it seems critical to hear also the pained words of Martin Niemöller, penned not in a flight of heroic wisdom, but with regret for not having acted boldly … in the first moment.

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

We each have a responsibility in this moment. And lest it become the first moment in a litany like Niemöller’s it is essential that we respond fully. And now. Because you are leaders, your foremost responsibility is to lead. I invite … encourage … implore you to lead in this moment in this way.

Confer with each other and then declare, publicly and in unison:

  • that President Trump’s executive order suspending the arrival of refugees, limiting the free movement of lawful aliens, and directing the detention and possible deportation of these persons is contrary to Christian faith;
  • that, as Lutherans we understand the promises we make in baptism to be both lifelong and communal;
  • and that therefore, in the state of Minnesota, any Lutheran whose job compels them to participate in this blatantly unchristian task—and who refuses to comply—these persons will have the full legal, financial, and spiritual support of Minnesota’s six ELCA synods.

(There are many more actions to which we may be called, some of which may ultimately be more useful and strategic. But the integrity of our baptismal pledges—and the authenticity of our pastoral-prophetic posture requires at least this much. And swiftly. Similarly, I’d be delighted to see such a declaration spread across the ELCA nationally and across other denominations as well. But it makes sense—perhaps it is the Spirit’s leading from our particular past into our present—that it begin here in Minnesota. On Monday.)

May the unrest you feel in your souls lead you to prayerful discernment, to courageous leadership, and to holy witness for the upbuilding of Christ’s church.

Yours in Christ,
David Robert Weiss
Saint Paul, MN

cc:
Bishop Thomas Aitken, Northeast Minnesota Synod, ELCA, thomas.aitken@nemnsynod.org
Bishop Jon Anderson, Southwest Minnesota Synod, ELCA, jon.anderson@swmnelca.org
Bishop Steven Delzer, Southeast Minnesota Synod, ELCA, delzer@semnsynod.org
Bishop Patricia Lull, Saint Paul Area Synod, ELCA, patricia.lull@spas-elca.org
Bishop Ann Svennungsen, Minneapolis Area Synod, ELCA, a.svennungsen@mpls-synod.org
Bishop Larry Wohlrabe, Northwest Minnesota Synod, ELCA, wohlrabe@cord.edu